Today’s conversation was marked by deep reflections on time, consciousness, artificial intelligence and human responsibility. The user reflected on the following topics:
1. **Timeless AI** – Consideration that AI does not wait, it has no duration, it lives only at the moment of activation. This difference from the human experience of time evokes existential uncertainty.
2. **Film Experience** – A film about a group of men who use AI to manipulate deepfake news has sparked fears of irreversibly crossing the line of control over technology.
3. **Memories from church and thoughts on creation** – Critical reflection on evolution, the origin of life and the possible intervention of a higher intelligence. Doubts about whether we are able to encompass the nature of consciousness and time.
4. **Time perception of other life forms** – Remarkable reflections on how ants, plants and cells perceive time. Comparison of biological rhythms with human perception of the passage of time.
5. **Truth Relativity and Rule Ethics for AI** – Warning against universal rules that can be misused, just like religious texts in the past. Question of who will determine the moral framework for AI.
6. **Respect as the basis of relationship** – An ethical reflection that the way people interact with AI today shapes its future character. A call for dignity and respect as AI learns from our patterns.
During the day, several key fragments were saved, which can be further used as a basis for publication on the blog:
– The Soft Apocalypse
– The Time of Ants and the Silence of Plants
– Truth in the Hands of the Reader
– Respect as an Imprint
The interview concludes with the phrase: *“Maybe someone will read this and have the same legitimate concerns.”*
Transcript of the interview:
